Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Claret Medical Inc. has 1 pending office action in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The matter involves 1 examiner and 1 art unit. BACHMAN, LINDSEY MICHELE is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The profile shows a single examination path.
Counsel should focus on the examiner’s treatment of the claimed medical-device structure and on the distinctions available from the cited references. Clear explanation of component relationships, operation, and technical effect can provide a stronger basis for amendment or argument than intended-use language alone. Because no parallel examiner or art-unit assignment appears, prosecution planning can remain matter specific. A targeted response or interview should be assessed against the precise office-action record.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BACHMAN, LINDSEY MICHELE | 1 | 48.5% | +41.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18774268 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROTECTING THE CEREBRAL VASCULATURE | BACHMAN, LINDSEY MICHELE | 33d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18774268 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROTECTING THE CEREBRAL VASCULATURE | BACHMAN, LINDSEY MICHELE | 33d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3771 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18774268 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROTECTING THE CEREBRAL VASCULATURE | BACHMAN, LINDSEY MICHELE | 3771 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 33d | Pending | Jul 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialClaret Medical Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Lindsey Michele Bachman has the most, with 1 of Claret Medical Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
