Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Claussen Technology LLC has 1 pending office action currently active in its patent portfolio. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, TRAN, JULIA C. The presence of only 1 pending matter suggests a focused prosecution effort for the company at this stage.
TRAN, JULIA C is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with a busiest examiner pending count of 1. This busiest examiner pending count of 1 is identical to the total number of 1 pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner handling the only pending action, the company's current interaction with the patent office is limited to a single individual.
The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current engagement with the patent office. Practitioners should note that the prosecution strategy is currently tied to the specific preferences of TRAN, JULIA C. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that no other pending matters are currently active for the company.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRAN, JULIA C | 1 | 62.5% | +31.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19039517 | IMPLEMENTS FOR DISPLACING GROUND MATERIAL | TRAN, JULIA C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19039517 | IMPLEMENTS FOR DISPLACING GROUND MATERIAL | TRAN, JULIA C | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19039517 | IMPLEMENTS FOR DISPLACING GROUND MATERIAL | TRAN, JULIA C | — | §102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 28, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial