Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Clearsign Technologies Corporation

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Clearsign Technologies Corporation currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are all consolidated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specialized technical focus for the company's current filings. The prosecution involves 3 distinct examiners, requiring the legal team to manage multiple interpersonal dynamics within a single administrative division.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SHIRSAT, VIVEK K, who is responsible for 2 pending office actions. This means that half of the 4 total pending actions are handled by this individual, while the remaining actions are split among the other distinct examiners. Practitioners should note that while the examiners vary, the concentration in the distinct art unit allows for a consistent understanding of that unit's specific examination standards.

The presence of pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector suggests an active phase of prosecution. Because all actions are in the same art unit, the company can leverage its experience with SHIRSAT, VIVEK K to inform its strategy for the other 3 examiners. Success in these matters will depend on navigating the specific requirements of the examiners while maintaining a unified technical argument.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHIRSAT, VIVEK K 2 74.3% +27.9%
LAU, JASON 1 54.1% +15.9%
JONES, LOGAN P 1 43.0% +31.6%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18778245 BURNER INCLUDING AN ELECTRICAL PERMITTIVITY OR ELECTRICAL CAPACITANCE FLAME SENSOR LAU, JASON —
18737219 HIGH PERFORMANCE LOW NOx BURNER AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATION SHIRSAT, VIVEK K —
18513131 HIGH PERFORMANCE LOW NOx BURNER AND SYSTEM SHIRSAT, VIVEK K —
17521722 PILOT STABILIZED BURNER JONES, LOGAN P —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18778245 BURNER INCLUDING AN ELECTRICAL PERMITTIVITY OR ELECTRICAL CAPACITANCE FLAME SENSOR LAU, JASON —
18737219 HIGH PERFORMANCE LOW NOx BURNER AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATION SHIRSAT, VIVEK K —
18513131 HIGH PERFORMANCE LOW NOx BURNER AND SYSTEM SHIRSAT, VIVEK K —
17521722 PILOT STABILIZED BURNER JONES, LOGAN P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3762 4

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18778245 BURNER INCLUDING AN ELECTRICAL PERMITTIVITY OR ELECTRICAL CAPACITANCE FLAME SENSOR LAU, JASON 3762 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 19, 2024
18737219 HIGH PERFORMANCE LOW NOx BURNER AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATION SHIRSAT, VIVEK K 3762 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 07, 2024
18513131 HIGH PERFORMANCE LOW NOx BURNER AND SYSTEM SHIRSAT, VIVEK K 3762 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2023
17521722 PILOT STABILIZED BURNER JONES, LOGAN P 3762 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 08, 2021

Managing Clearsign Technologies Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Clearsign Technologies Corporation have?

Clearsign Technologies Corporation has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Clearsign Technologies Corporation applications?

Vivek K Shirsat has the most, with 2 of Clearsign Technologies Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Clearsign Technologies Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month