Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Clearspeed Inc.

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Clearspeed Inc. maintains a company patent portfolio within the Communications technology area. The portfolio currently includes 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit.

SHAH, ANTIM G is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This examiner is responsible for the pending office action reported in the data. The use of the distinct art unit indicates a focused technical scope within the Communications field.

The presence of the distinct examiner suggests that the portfolio's current examination is centralized. Because the busiest examiner pending action is assigned to SHAH, ANTIM G, the immediate trajectory of the Clearspeed Inc. portfolio is tied to this single examiner's review. The limited count of the pending office action reflects a narrow window of active prosecution for the company at this stage.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHAH, ANTIM G 1 74.2% +39.2%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18662754 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUDIO SAMPLE QUALITY CONTROL SHAH, ANTIM G 38d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2693 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18662754 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUDIO SAMPLE QUALITY CONTROL SHAH, ANTIM G 2693 §103 Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending May 13, 2024

Managing Clearspeed Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month