Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Cleveland State University

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Networking & Security

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cleveland State University manages a patent portfolio in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The university currently has 4 pending office actions, which are assigned to 4 distinct examiners. This ratio between actions and examiners indicates that the university's current applications are being reviewed independently by multiple individuals at the patent office.

The prosecution activity is distributed across 4 distinct art units, reflecting a wide range of technical research within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector. DICKINSON, PAUL W is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With 4 pending office actions spread across different art units, the university faces a complex prosecution landscape that requires navigating various examiner expectations. For a practitioner, this distribution means that the outcome of one office action is unlikely to influence the others, as each is being handled in a unique administrative and technical environment. The university's current profile suggests a diverse array of intellectual property assets that span multiple specialized fields of study.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DICKINSON, PAUL W 1 63.1% +9.5%
HALVORSON, MARK 1 47.9% +20.7%
THROWER, LARRY W 1 65.9% +12.6%
ALMEIDA, DEVIN E 1 71.5% +11.2%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17326796 PRIVACY PRESERVING APPROACH TO PEAK LOAD MANAGEMENT ALMEIDA, DEVIN E 23d
18235920 TUMOR RESECTION PROCESS AND COMPOSITION CONTAINING IRIDIUM-CONTAINING NUCLEOSIDE DICKINSON, PAUL W —
17706997 INFECTION-RESISTANT AND BIOACTIVE INTERBODY DEVICE, AND ASSOCIATED COMPOSTION AND METHOD THROWER, LARRY W —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17326796 PRIVACY PRESERVING APPROACH TO PEAK LOAD MANAGEMENT ALMEIDA, DEVIN E 23d
17987058 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF TREATMENT OF SICKLE CELL ANEMIA AND BETA-THALASSEMIA HALVORSON, MARK —
17706997 INFECTION-RESISTANT AND BIOACTIVE INTERBODY DEVICE, AND ASSOCIATED COMPOSTION AND METHOD THROWER, LARRY W —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1618 1
1646 1
1754 1
2492 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18235920 TUMOR RESECTION PROCESS AND COMPOSITION CONTAINING IRIDIUM-CONTAINING NUCLEOSIDE DICKINSON, PAUL W 1618 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 21, 2023
17987058 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF TREATMENT OF SICKLE CELL ANEMIA AND BETA-THALASSEMIA HALVORSON, MARK 1646 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2022
17706997 INFECTION-RESISTANT AND BIOACTIVE INTERBODY DEVICE, AND ASSOCIATED COMPOSTION AND METHOD THROWER, LARRY W 1754 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 29, 2022
17326796 PRIVACY PRESERVING APPROACH TO PEAK LOAD MANAGEMENT ALMEIDA, DEVIN E 2492 §102§103 Final Rejection 23d Pending May 21, 2021

Managing Cleveland State University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month