Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Clever Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Clever Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These are in 2 distinct art units. This spread suggests that the company's research covers multiple specialized fields within the broader chemistry sector. Having 2 different administrative groups review the cases requires a prosecution strategy that accounts for varying standards and prior art landscapes. Practitioners must tailor their approach to the specific requirements of each of the 2 units involved to ensure consistent progress. This distribution across 2 units indicates a breadth of technical subject matter.

2 distinct examiners are reviewing the cases. RESTO OQUENDO, NATHALY MARIE is the busiest with 1 pending office action. This distribution means that the workload is split between different individuals. The company must navigate the individual styles and interpretations of 2 different people across the 2 units. The prosecution strategy should involve monitoring the feedback from all officials to identify unique challenges in the Chemistry & Materials sector. Success requires a balanced approach to satisfy RESTO OQUENDO, NATHALY MARIE and the other assigned examiner while managing 2 separate prosecution tracks.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RESTO OQUENDO, NATHALY MARIE 1 50.0% +100.0%
SCHATZ, CHRISTOPHER T 1 62.6% +27.3%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18682553 DEVICE FOR FORMING SHARK FIN OF 3-SIDED SEALING POUCH TYPE SECONDARY BATTERY SCHATZ, CHRISTOPHER T —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18682582 DEVICE FOR FORMING SHARK FIN OF 3-SIDED SEALING POUCH TYPE SECONDARY BATTERY RESTO OQUENDO, NATHALY MARIE —
18682553 DEVICE FOR FORMING SHARK FIN OF 3-SIDED SEALING POUCH TYPE SECONDARY BATTERY SCHATZ, CHRISTOPHER T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1725 1
1746 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18682582 DEVICE FOR FORMING SHARK FIN OF 3-SIDED SEALING POUCH TYPE SECONDARY BATTERY RESTO OQUENDO, NATHALY MARIE 1725 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2024
18682553 DEVICE FOR FORMING SHARK FIN OF 3-SIDED SEALING POUCH TYPE SECONDARY BATTERY SCHATZ, CHRISTOPHER T 1746 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2024

Managing Clever Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Clever Co. Ltd. have?

Clever Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Clever Co. Ltd. applications?

Nathaly Marie Resto Oquendo has the most, with 1 of Clever Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Clever Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month