Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (25%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHOI, YUK TING | 1 | 71.4% | +36.4% |
| LOHARIKAR, ANAND R | 1 | 69.6% | +26.0% |
| SAVENKOV, VADIM | 1 | 61.1% | +20.8% |
| KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | 1 | 88.9% | +14.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18350055 | SYSTEMS AND METHODOLOGIES FOR AUTO LABELING VULNERABILITIES | KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18538630 | FAI MODEL DRIVEN RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | LOHARIKAR, ANAND R | 6d |
| 18599752 | ENHANCED NO-CODE ETL SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED BIG DATA TRANSFORMATION AND SHARING | CHOI, YUK TING | — |
| 18493764 | SCALABLE REPORTING SYSTEM FOR SECURITY ANALYTICS | SAVENKOV, VADIM | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18538630 | FAI MODEL DRIVEN RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | LOHARIKAR, ANAND R | 6d |
| 18599752 | ENHANCED NO-CODE ETL SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED BIG DATA TRANSFORMATION AND SHARING | CHOI, YUK TING | — |
| 18493764 | SCALABLE REPORTING SYSTEM FOR SECURITY ANALYTICS | SAVENKOV, VADIM | — |
| 18350055 | SYSTEMS AND METHODOLOGIES FOR AUTO LABELING VULNERABILITIES | KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2164 | 1 |
| 3689 | 1 |
| 2432 | 1 |
| 2408 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18599752 | ENHANCED NO-CODE ETL SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED BIG DATA TRANSFORMATION AND SHARING | CHOI, YUK TING | 2164 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 08, 2024 |
| 18538630 | FAI MODEL DRIVEN RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | LOHARIKAR, ANAND R | 3689 | §101 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | Dec 13, 2023 |
| 18493764 | SCALABLE REPORTING SYSTEM FOR SECURITY ANALYTICS | SAVENKOV, VADIM | 2432 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 24, 2023 |
| 18350055 | SYSTEMS AND METHODOLOGIES FOR AUTO LABELING VULNERABILITIES | KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | 2408 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial