Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cmes Robotics Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The portfolio is active in 1 distinct art unit. ESTEVEZ, DAIRON is the busiest examiner.
ESTEVEZ, DAIRON has 1 pending action, which is the busiest examiner pending count. The 1 distinct examiner is the only examiner for the 1 pending office action. This 1 distinct examiner operates in the 1 distinct art unit. The Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area is the technical category for the 1 distinct art unit.
The matching counts of 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner simplify the prosecution strategy. For a practitioner, the 1 distinct art unit means there is only one set of technical standards to address. The 1 pending action is the total current activity, making the feedback from ESTEVEZ, DAIRON the primary focus for the company.
Because the number of 1 pending office action is equal to the number of 1 distinct art unit, there is no technical overlap with other groups. The 1 distinct examiner has sole responsibility for the pending matter. This 1 to 1 structure allows for a direct and focused response to the 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESTEVEZ, DAIRON | 1 | 68.4% | -12.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18943679 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOUNTING VEHICLE PARTS | ESTEVEZ, DAIRON | 4d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3656 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18943679 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOUNTING VEHICLE PARTS | ESTEVEZ, DAIRON | 3656 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 4d overdue | Pending | Nov 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial