Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026

CMR Surgical Limited

15 pending office actions • 8 art units • 13 examiners • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (27%)
11
Medium (73%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only9 (60%)
§102 only2 (13%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (27%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
12
Mechanical / Eng
80% of docket
3
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MOLNAR, SIDNEY LEIGH 2 52.4% +79.4%
CHOU, WILLIAM B 2 73.2% +21.2%
PECHE, JORGE O 1 80.5% +16.9%
KOLKIN, ADAM D. 1 47.3% +6.7%
SARCENO ROBLES, CHRISTIAN MANUEL 1
EL SAYAH, MOHAMAD O 1 75.4% +3.1%
DOROS, KAYLA RENEE 1 72.7% +10.2%
COLLINS, SEAN W 1 74.6% +27.1%
ANDERSON, MICHAEL W. 1 44.7% +52.7%
WELCH, WILLOW GRACE 1 50.0% +52.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18997112 CONTROL OF A SURGICAL ROBOT ARM PECHE, JORGE O

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19021872 ENDOSCOPE KOLKIN, ADAM D. 16d overdue
18696456 A ROBOTIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT COLLINS, SEAN W
18247482 SURGICAL ROBOT CALIBRATION DEVICE SIRCAR, ALISHA JITENDRA
18005450 GEARED INSTRUMENTS BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18012771 JOINT CONTROL IN A MECHANICAL SYSTEM MOLNAR, SIDNEY LEIGH 7d
18617523 CONTROL SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING A SURGICAL ROBOT ARM ANDERSON, MICHAEL W. 41d
18997112 CONTROL OF A SURGICAL ROBOT ARM PECHE, JORGE O
18847132 GRIP FORCE CONTROL IN A SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEM DOROS, KAYLA RENEE
18696456 A ROBOTIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT COLLINS, SEAN W
18580426 A ROBOTIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WELCH, WILLOW GRACE
18043409 CONTROL SYSTEM FOR SURGICAL ROBOT SYSTEM WITH SAFETY MONITOR MOLNAR, SIDNEY LEIGH
17811098 CAMERA CONTROL CHOU, WILLIAM B

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 2
3792 2
3656 2
3795 2
3798 1
3794 1
3693 1
3796 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18997112 CONTROL OF A SURGICAL ROBOT ARM PECHE, JORGE O §102 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 20, 2025
19021872 ENDOSCOPE KOLKIN, ADAM D. 3798 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending Jan 15, 2025
18881086 APPLYING ENERGY TO AN ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENT SARCENO ROBLES, CHRISTIAN MANUEL §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 03, 2025
18880437 CALIBRATING A SURGICAL ROBOT ARM EL SAYAH, MOHAMAD O §103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 31, 2024
18847132 GRIP FORCE CONTROL IN A SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEM DOROS, KAYLA RENEE 3771 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 13, 2024
18696456 A ROBOTIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT COLLINS, SEAN W 3794 §103§112 Final Rejection Pending Mar 28, 2024
18617523 CONTROL SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING A SURGICAL ROBOT ARM ANDERSON, MICHAEL W. 3693 §103 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Mar 26, 2024
18580426 A ROBOTIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WELCH, WILLOW GRACE 3792 §103 Final Rejection Pending Jan 18, 2024
18475962 SECURING A DRIVING ELEMENT IN AN INSTRUMENT INTERFACE OF A ROBOTIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT FISHBACK, ASHLEY LAUREN 3771 §102 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 27, 2023
18247482 SURGICAL ROBOT CALIBRATION DEVICE SIRCAR, ALISHA JITENDRA 3792 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 31, 2023
18043409 CONTROL SYSTEM FOR SURGICAL ROBOT SYSTEM WITH SAFETY MONITOR MOLNAR, SIDNEY LEIGH 3656 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 28, 2023
18005450 GEARED INSTRUMENTS BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 3796 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 13, 2023
18012771 JOINT CONTROL IN A MECHANICAL SYSTEM MOLNAR, SIDNEY LEIGH 3656 §103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Dec 23, 2022
17811098 CAMERA CONTROL CHOU, WILLIAM B 3795 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 07, 2022
17811099 CAMERA CONTROL CHOU, WILLIAM B 3795 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 07, 2022

Managing CMR Surgical Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month