2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cogitat Ltd. is currently addressing 2 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners. This distribution shows that each pending matter is being handled by a different individual at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is CATTUNGAL, SANJAY, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This examiner's pending count is part of the 2 total actions being managed across 2 distinct examiners.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CATTUNGAL, SANJAY | 1 | 83.5% | +11.1% |
| SPRATT, BEAU D | 1 | 78.8% | +24.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18835771 | Classification of Brain Activity Signals | CATTUNGAL, SANJAY | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18292780 | Learnable Filters for EEG Classification | SPRATT, BEAU D | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18835771 | Classification of Brain Activity Signals | CATTUNGAL, SANJAY | — |
| 18292780 | Learnable Filters for EEG Classification | SPRATT, BEAU D | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18835771 | Classification of Brain Activity Signals | CATTUNGAL, SANJAY | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 05, 2024 |
| 18292780 | Learnable Filters for EEG Classification | SPRATT, BEAU D | — | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial