Technology area: Computing & Software
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corp. has 3 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The matters involve 3 examiners and 3 art units, indicating separate examination paths within the portfolio.
KOIRALA, NIROJ is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Each examiner has one listed matter, so responses should be developed independently while preserving consistent positions on related software claim issues.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| §112 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOIRALA, NIROJ | 1 | — | — |
| LAHAM BAUZO, ALVARO SALIM | 1 | 50.0% | +100.0% |
| BOSTWICK, SIDNEY VINCENT | 1 | 51.6% | +37.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17855914 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZED GENERATION EVALUATION, SELECTION OF SOLUTIONS USING IMPROVED DISTRIBUTED EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTING | LAHAM BAUZO, ALVARO SALIM | 34d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17855955 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING WEIGHT INITIALIZATION FOR NEURAL NETWORK MODELS | BOSTWICK, SIDNEY VINCENT | 6d |
| 17855914 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZED GENERATION EVALUATION, SELECTION OF SOLUTIONS USING IMPROVED DISTRIBUTED EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTING | LAHAM BAUZO, ALVARO SALIM | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2129 | 1 |
| 2146 | 1 |
| 2124 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18641886 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADDING EXPLAINABILITY TO DEEP LEARNING MODELS USING RULE-SET EVOLUTION | KOIRALA, NIROJ | 2129 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 22, 2024 |
| 17855914 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZED GENERATION EVALUATION, SELECTION OF SOLUTIONS USING IMPROVED DISTRIBUTED EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTING | LAHAM BAUZO, ALVARO SALIM | 2146 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Jul 01, 2022 |
| 17855955 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING WEIGHT INITIALIZATION FOR NEURAL NETWORK MODELS | BOSTWICK, SIDNEY VINCENT | 2124 | §112 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | Jul 01, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialCognizant Technology Solutions US Corp. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.
Niroj Koirala has the most, with 1 of Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corp.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.