Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Colab AI Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Colab AI Inc. is currently engaged in the patent prosecution process within the Computing & Software technology area. The portfolio shows 1 pending office action, which is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. This indicates a very specific focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts. CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL is the busiest examiner for this applicant, as he is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently on the docket.

The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a narrow technical scope for the pending application. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the success of the 1 pending office action depends entirely on the interaction with CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL. This centralized approach in 1 distinct art unit allows for a focused legal strategy. The 1 pending office action represents the current hurdle for Colab AI Inc. in the Computing & Software sector. Practitioners should tailor their arguments to the specific technical standards of the 1 distinct art unit and the preferences of the 1 distinct examiner to move the portfolio forward.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
50% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CRANDALL, RICHARD W. 1 30.2% +33.8%
CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL 1 41.5% +35.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18982594 Systems and Methods for Providing a Recommendation for a Product Design Within a Collaborative System CRANDALL, RICHARD W. 46d
18508601 Multi-User Collaboration Systems, and Methods of Providing Thereof CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18982594 Systems and Methods for Providing a Recommendation for a Product Design Within a Collaborative System CRANDALL, RICHARD W. 46d
18508601 Multi-User Collaboration Systems, and Methods of Providing Thereof CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3619 1
2171 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18982594 Systems and Methods for Providing a Recommendation for a Product Design Within a Collaborative System CRANDALL, RICHARD W. 3619 §101§103 Final Rejection 46d Pending Dec 16, 2024
18508601 Multi-User Collaboration Systems, and Methods of Providing Thereof CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL 2171 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 14, 2023

Managing Colab AI Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month