Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Coledy Inc. currently has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 2 actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units and are being handled by 2 distinct examiners. This 1 to 1 ratio of examiners to pending actions means that each case is subject to an independent review process. CHU, KING M is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 pending office action.
With 2 pending office actions total, the company's prosecution strategy is split between CHU, KING M and one other examiner. The presence of 2 distinct art units for only 2 cases suggests that the company's technology, while limited in volume, touches on different specialized areas. Practitioners must prepare separate strategies for each of the 2 pending office actions, as there is no overlap in personnel or technical groups. Success depends on navigating 2 different sets of examiner expectations.
The 1 to 1 ratio of examiners to actions means that no single examiner's history will provide a template for the rest of the portfolio. Because the 2 pending office actions are spread across 2 distinct art units, the company faces a fragmented examination process. This requires a prosecution strategy that is both technically broad and individually focused, as the 2 distinct examiners will likely apply different standards of review across the 2 different medical disciplines.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHU, KING M | 1 | 75.5% | +13.1% |
| KUMAR, RAKESH | 1 | 57.2% | +28.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18935386 | PASSING DEVICE, CONTENT RECEIVING MECHANISM EQUIPPED WITH PASSING DEVICE, MEDICATION MANAGEMENT DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT TO DISCHARGE CONTENT | KUMAR, RAKESH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19483603 | LOCKING DEVICE FOR CONTAINER, AND CONTAINER ASSEMBLY HAVING SAME | CHU, KING M | — |
| 18935386 | PASSING DEVICE, CONTENT RECEIVING MECHANISM EQUIPPED WITH PASSING DEVICE, MEDICATION MANAGEMENT DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT TO DISCHARGE CONTENT | KUMAR, RAKESH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3735 | 1 |
| 3651 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19483603 | LOCKING DEVICE FOR CONTAINER, AND CONTAINER ASSEMBLY HAVING SAME | CHU, KING M | 3735 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 11, 2025 |
| 18935386 | PASSING DEVICE, CONTENT RECEIVING MECHANISM EQUIPPED WITH PASSING DEVICE, MEDICATION MANAGEMENT DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT TO DISCHARGE CONTENT | KUMAR, RAKESH | 3651 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialColedy Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
King M Chu has the most, with 1 of Coledy Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
