Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

Collibra Belgium BV

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (33%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (67%)
No statute on record1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
67% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PHILLIPS, III, ALBERT M 1 81.6% +12.5%
LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI 1 84.7% +48.0%
HENNING, MATTHEW T 1 71.1% +18.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19289979 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UNIVERSAL REFERENCE SOURCE CREATION AND ACCURATE SECURE MATCHING PHILLIPS, III, ALBERT M
19007116 SYSTEM FOR PREPARING MACHINE LEARNING TRAINING DATA FOR USE IN EVALUATION OF TERM DEFINITION QUALITY LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19289979 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UNIVERSAL REFERENCE SOURCE CREATION AND ACCURATE SECURE MATCHING PHILLIPS, III, ALBERT M
19007116 SYSTEM FOR PREPARING MACHINE LEARNING TRAINING DATA FOR USE IN EVALUATION OF TERM DEFINITION QUALITY LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI
19003682 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR POLICY MANAGEMENT HENNING, MATTHEW T

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2491 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19289979 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UNIVERSAL REFERENCE SOURCE CREATION AND ACCURATE SECURE MATCHING PHILLIPS, III, ALBERT M §101§112 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 04, 2025
19007116 SYSTEM FOR PREPARING MACHINE LEARNING TRAINING DATA FOR USE IN EVALUATION OF TERM DEFINITION QUALITY LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 31, 2024
19003682 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR POLICY MANAGEMENT HENNING, MATTHEW T 2491 Other Final Rejection Pending Dec 27, 2024

Managing Collibra Belgium BV's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month