Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Colormatrix Holdings Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. This singular focus suggests that the company's current patent prosecution is concentrated on a specific chemical or material innovation. The presence of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the company is not currently managing cross-unit procedural differences for its pending chemistry applications.
LAN, YAN is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. As the sole examiner involved, Lan's individual prosecution history and preferences will be a factor for the outcome of this filing. The fact that the 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner allows for a highly specialized prosecution strategy. This streamlined structure reduces the administrative complexity of the company's intellectual property efforts.
Practitioners should prioritize a thorough review of the 1 pending office action to ensure a precise response to the examiner's requirements. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company can focus its resources on the specific technical expectations of the Chemistry & Materials field. Prosecution strategy can be tailored to meet the standards of the 1 distinct art unit. Resolving the 1 pending office action efficiently will be the primary goal for this material science portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAN, YAN | 1 | 63.1% | +21.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1782 | 1 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial