Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Comnav Technology Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Comnav Technology Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, CAMBY, RICHARD M, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The prosecution is limited to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a very narrow and focused interaction with the patent office for the company's current pending matters.

With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on a single point of review. This 1 pending office action represents the full extent of the company's current activity in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. Practitioners should note that the lack of diversity in examiners and art units means that the outcome of this specific matter will define the company's current success rate in this technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CAMBY, RICHARD M 1 89.3% +6.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18880465 CONTROL METHOD OF MEASUREMENT SYSTEM, MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM CAMBY, RICHARD M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3661 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18880465 CONTROL METHOD OF MEASUREMENT SYSTEM, MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM CAMBY, RICHARD M 3661 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 31, 2024

Managing Comnav Technology Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month