Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Concord Iii LLC has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated prosecution effort. The busiest examiner for the company is NAZAR, AHAMED I, who is currently handling 1 pending office action. This means that all of the company's active prosecution is under the supervision of this 1 individual within a single administrative unit.
The focus on Computing & Software suggests that the company's current patent goals are technically specific. Because there is only 1 examiner and 1 art unit involved, the outcome of the entire pending portfolio is subject to the specific interpretations of this 1 examiner. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the examination patterns of this examiner, as there are no other pending actions to provide a broader view of the company's standing at the patent office. This 1 to 1 ratio between actions and examiners simplifies the management of the portfolio but increases the impact of a single decision.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NAZAR, AHAMED I | 1 | 53.7% | +31.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18484663 | SUMMARIZATION PROCESSOR FOR UNSTRUCTURED HEALTH CARE DOCUMENTATION RECEIVED FROM OVER A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | NAZAR, AHAMED I | 77d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2178 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18484663 | SUMMARIZATION PROCESSOR FOR UNSTRUCTURED HEALTH CARE DOCUMENTATION RECEIVED FROM OVER A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | NAZAR, AHAMED I | 2178 | §103 | Final Rejection | 77d overdue | Pending | Oct 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial