Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 9 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 25 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft is managing 9 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These 9 actions are handled by 9 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is reviewing exactly one application. These matters are spread across 8 distinct art units, showing a high degree of technical diversity within the portfolio.

MCDOWELL, JR, MAURICE L is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. The high number of 8 art units relative to the 9 total actions suggests that the company's communications-related filings cover a wide variety of specific technical sub-fields. Because there are 9 distinct examiners working across 8 art units, the company is interacting with a different individual for almost every pending matter. This decentralized environment requires a prosecution strategy that can adapt to the specific preferences of 9 different examiners across nearly as many specialized technical groups at the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (60%)
3
Medium (30%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (30%)
§101 + other2 (20%)
§103 only3 (30%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
5
Communications
50% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCDOWELL, JR, MAURICE L 1 86.6% +12.9%
GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A 1 22.1% +23.4%
SCHMIEDER, NICOLE A K 1 68.2% +34.0%
DARDANO, STEFANO ANTHONY 1 78.5% +31.9%
HASKINS, TWYLER LAMB 1 57.1% +8.8%
OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 1 16.2% +14.1%
BASHIR, ADEEL 1 89.6% +4.9%
BOLEN, NICHOLAS D 1 9.4% +10.0%
REINBOLD, SCOTT A 1 69.4% +13.2%
FRENCH, CORRELL T 1 44.4% +32.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18737565 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERSONALIZED AVATAR GENERATION USING PHOTO IMAGE ANALYSIS BASHIR, ADEEL 3d overdue

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19003972 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADJUSTING AN AVATAR MODEL BASED ON COMPUTATIONAL COST MCDOWELL, JR, MAURICE L —
19003810 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED GRADING OF WRITTEN RESPONSE TESTS GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A —
18982088 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPEECH GENERATION USING LATENT FEATURES EXTRACTED FROM INTERMEDIATE LAYERS OF AN ACOUSTIC MODEL SCHMIEDER, NICOLE A K —
18895693 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATING COURSES GENERATED USING MACHINE LEARNING INTO A CURRICULUM OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF —
18434201 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING DIGITAL CONTENT BASED ON USER ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT BOLEN, NICHOLAS D —
18357636 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACTIVE ASSESSMENT OF A USER PROFILE BASED ON TRAINING MATERIAL FRENCH, CORRELL T —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18533846 OPTIMAL SLIP ANGLE STEERING CONTROL FOR VEHICLES REINBOLD, SCOTT A 7d
19003972 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADJUSTING AN AVATAR MODEL BASED ON COMPUTATIONAL COST MCDOWELL, JR, MAURICE L —
19003810 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED GRADING OF WRITTEN RESPONSE TESTS GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A —
18982088 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPEECH GENERATION USING LATENT FEATURES EXTRACTED FROM INTERMEDIATE LAYERS OF AN ACOUSTIC MODEL SCHMIEDER, NICOLE A K —
18946021 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINING NEURAL NETWORKS TO IDENTIFY AND GEOLOCATE RACERS ON A RACE COURSE DARDANO, STEFANO ANTHONY —
18895693 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATING COURSES GENERATED USING MACHINE LEARNING INTO A CURRICULUM OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF —
18434201 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING DIGITAL CONTENT BASED ON USER ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT BOLEN, NICHOLAS D —
18357636 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACTIVE ASSESSMENT OF A USER PROFILE BASED ON TRAINING MATERIAL FRENCH, CORRELL T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3715 2
2612 1
2659 1
2663 1
2639 1
3622 1
2616 1
3624 1
3747 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19003972 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADJUSTING AN AVATAR MODEL BASED ON COMPUTATIONAL COST MCDOWELL, JR, MAURICE L 2612 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 27, 2024
19003810 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED GRADING OF WRITTEN RESPONSE TESTS GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A 3715 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 27, 2024
18982088 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPEECH GENERATION USING LATENT FEATURES EXTRACTED FROM INTERMEDIATE LAYERS OF AN ACOUSTIC MODEL SCHMIEDER, NICOLE A K 2659 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18946021 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINING NEURAL NETWORKS TO IDENTIFY AND GEOLOCATE RACERS ON A RACE COURSE DARDANO, STEFANO ANTHONY 2663 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18933475 AUTOMATIC MEASUREMENT OF RACING VEHICLE DETAILS HASKINS, TWYLER LAMB 2639 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18895693 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATING COURSES GENERATED USING MACHINE LEARNING INTO A CURRICULUM OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 3622 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 25, 2024
18737565 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERSONALIZED AVATAR GENERATION USING PHOTO IMAGE ANALYSIS BASHIR, ADEEL 2616 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Jun 07, 2024
18434201 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING DIGITAL CONTENT BASED ON USER ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT BOLEN, NICHOLAS D 3624 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 06, 2024
18533846 OPTIMAL SLIP ANGLE STEERING CONTROL FOR VEHICLES REINBOLD, SCOTT A 3747 §112 Final Rejection 7d Pending Dec 08, 2023
18357636 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACTIVE ASSESSMENT OF A USER PROFILE BASED ON TRAINING MATERIAL FRENCH, CORRELL T 3715 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2023

Managing Constructor Education and Research Genossenschaft's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month