Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Copenhagen Atomics A/S currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which suggests a highly concentrated prosecution effort. By focusing on 1 active case, the applicant can provide a detailed response to the specific technical objections raised by the USPTO.
The case is situated within 1 distinct art unit, subjecting the application to the procedural standards of that department. The busiest examiner, GARNER, LILY CRABTREE, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the entire pending workload is limited to 1 examiner in 1 art unit, the administrative complexity is minimized. This structure places significant importance on the relationship with GARNER, LILY CRABTREE for the advancement of the portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GARNER, LILY CRABTREE | 1 | 68.2% | +16.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19121078 | MOLTEN SALT NUCLEAR REACTOR AND METHOD OF AUTOMATIC SHUTDOWN OF SUCH NUCLEAR REACTOR | GARNER, LILY CRABTREE | 145d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19121078 | MOLTEN SALT NUCLEAR REACTOR AND METHOD OF AUTOMATIC SHUTDOWN OF SUCH NUCLEAR REACTOR | GARNER, LILY CRABTREE | 145d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3646 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19121078 | MOLTEN SALT NUCLEAR REACTOR AND METHOD OF AUTOMATIC SHUTDOWN OF SUCH NUCLEAR REACTOR | GARNER, LILY CRABTREE | 3646 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 145d overdue | Pending | Apr 14, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial