Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Core Solutions Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, TIEDEMAN, JASON S, who is also the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit, which indicates the technical focus of the current application.
With TIEDEMAN, JASON S handling 1 pending office action, the company's interaction with the patent office is limited to the 1 distinct examiner. This concentration allows for a prosecution strategy tailored to the specific requirements of the examiner. The presence of 1 distinct art unit further shows that the pending workload is not dispersed across different sections of the patent office.
The data shows a prosecution profile where the metrics for distinct examiners and art units are limited. This structure means that the outcome of the 1 pending office action will determine the company's immediate success in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. The focused nature of the portfolio at this stage simplifies the management of the 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIEDEMAN, JASON S | 1 | 28.5% | +34.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18646948 | IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYTICS OF DIAGNOSIS INDICATORS WITH NARRATIVE NOTES | TIEDEMAN, JASON S | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18646948 | IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYTICS OF DIAGNOSIS INDICATORS WITH NARRATIVE NOTES | TIEDEMAN, JASON S | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3683 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18646948 | IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYTICS OF DIAGNOSIS INDICATORS WITH NARRATIVE NOTES | TIEDEMAN, JASON S | 3683 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Apr 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial