Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Corecreation Ug is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is being processed within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very specific technical focus for the organization's current patent prosecution efforts.
REDDY, SUNITA is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Since this represents the totality of the company's pending workload, the relationship with this individual examiner is the primary factor in the current prosecution cycle. Practitioners should focus their efforts on addressing the specific concerns of this 1 distinct examiner to achieve a favorable outcome.
The presence of only 1 distinct art unit for the 1 pending office action reduces the complexity of the administrative oversight required. There is no need to manage multiple examiner styles or different art unit policies. The success of the current prosecution strategy rests on the resolution of the 1 pending office action currently assigned to REDDY, SUNITA.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| REDDY, SUNITA | 1 | 67.4% | +61.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18720761 | Device, System, and Method for Prolapse Alleviation and/or Incontinence | REDDY, SUNITA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18720761 | Device, System, and Method for Prolapse Alleviation and/or Incontinence | REDDY, SUNITA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18720761 | Device, System, and Method for Prolapse Alleviation and/or Incontinence | REDDY, SUNITA | 3791 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialCorecreation Ug has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Sunita Reddy has the most, with 1 of Corecreation Ug's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
