Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Coretex Limited has 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners. The portfolio's current activity is focused within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a specialized focus for the company's pending intellectual property. This concentration in a single unit may lead to more consistent examination standards compared to portfolios spread across multiple units.
MA, LISA is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 distinct examiners for the 2 pending actions, the workload is divided equally among the participating examiners within the single art unit. This arrangement means that while the art unit is consistent, the company must still navigate the individual preferences of 2 distinct examiners. The presence of 2 examiners for only 2 actions prevents any single individual from controlling the entire pending portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MA, LISA | 1 | 47.7% | +44.8% |
| ZEROUAL, OMAR | 1 | 33.5% | +39.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18250941 | PRODUCT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | MA, LISA | 139d overdue |
| 18186139 | GOODS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | ZEROUAL, OMAR | 70d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18250941 | PRODUCT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | MA, LISA | 139d overdue |
| 18186139 | GOODS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | ZEROUAL, OMAR | 70d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18250941 | PRODUCT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | MA, LISA | 3628 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | 139d overdue | Pending | Apr 27, 2023 |
| 18186139 | GOODS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | ZEROUAL, OMAR | 3628 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 70d | Pending | Mar 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial