Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Coretronic Intelligent Robotics Corporation

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
33% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHANDRASIRI, UPUL PRIYADARSHAN 1 12.5% -16.7%
ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN 1 54.5% +47.5%
EDWARDS, ETHAN WESLEY 1 78.6% +27.3%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18318714 AUTOMATED MOVING VEHICLE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF CHANDRASIRI, UPUL PRIYADARSHAN 6d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17967897 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SPATIAL STATIC MAP CONSTRUCTION EDWARDS, ETHAN WESLEY 120d overdue
17994404 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE AND LANDING METHOD FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN 44d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3665 1
3667 1
2857 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18318714 AUTOMATED MOVING VEHICLE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF CHANDRASIRI, UPUL PRIYADARSHAN 3665 §103 Non-Final OA 6d Pending May 16, 2023
17994404 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE AND LANDING METHOD FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN 3667 §103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Nov 28, 2022
17967897 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SPATIAL STATIC MAP CONSTRUCTION EDWARDS, ETHAN WESLEY 2857 §103 Final Rejection 120d overdue Pending Oct 18, 2022

Managing Coretronic Intelligent Robotics Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month