Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cornami Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cornami Inc. has 2 pending office actions in Communications. The matters involve 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, so the pending work is distributed across separate examination assignments.

DUNPHY, DAVID F is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Counsel should maintain separate response analyses for the two examiner and art-unit settings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (50%)
1
Unknown (50%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting only1 (50%)
No statute on record1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
50% of docket
1
Communications
50% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DUNPHY, DAVID F 1 85.4% +10.0%
WANG, HARRY Z 1 82.8% +8.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18921630 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPRESSING APPLICATION DATA FOR OPERATIONS ON MULTI-CORE SYSTEMS DUNPHY, DAVID F —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18921630 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPRESSING APPLICATION DATA FOR OPERATIONS ON MULTI-CORE SYSTEMS DUNPHY, DAVID F —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2673 1
2184 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18921630 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPRESSING APPLICATION DATA FOR OPERATIONS ON MULTI-CORE SYSTEMS DUNPHY, DAVID F 2673 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 21, 2024
18760926 SHARING HIGH SPEED SERIAL INTERCONNECTS FOR DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS WANG, HARRY Z 2184 Other Final Rejection — Pending Jul 01, 2024

Managing Cornami Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Cornami Inc. have?

Cornami Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Cornami Inc. applications?

David F Dunphy has the most, with 1 of Cornami Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Cornami Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month