Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Corsmed AB currently has 2 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These 2 pending office actions are distributed between 2 distinct examiners. This distribution shows that each examiner is responsible for one pending matter, ensuring that the company's current workload is not concentrated under a single individual.
The prosecution activity is contained within 1 distinct art unit. This count of 1 distinct art unit is lower than the 2 distinct examiners, indicating that both examiners operate within the same technical department. HYDER, G.M. ALI is the busiest examiner for the company, with a busiest examiner pending count of 1. This busiest examiner pending count of 1 matches the workload of the other examiner involved.
For practitioners, the 2 pending office actions represent a small portfolio with a specific technical focus. The use of 2 distinct examiners within 1 distinct art unit allows for different perspectives on the company's Communications technology. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that the workload is evenly split between the 2 distinct examiners.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HYDER, G.M. ALI | 1 | 90.6% | +7.2% |
| NAKHJAVAN, SHERVIN K | 1 | 88.3% | +11.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18708770 | A METHOD FOR IMAGE PARAMETER COMPARSION IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SIMULATION | NAKHJAVAN, SHERVIN K | 57d |
| 19041469 | METHOD FOR SIMULATION OF A MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER | HYDER, G.M. ALI | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18708770 | A METHOD FOR IMAGE PARAMETER COMPARSION IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SIMULATION | NAKHJAVAN, SHERVIN K | 57d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2672 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19041469 | METHOD FOR SIMULATION OF A MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER | HYDER, G.M. ALI | — | §102§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 30, 2025 |
| 18708770 | A METHOD FOR IMAGE PARAMETER COMPARSION IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SIMULATION | NAKHJAVAN, SHERVIN K | 2672 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 57d | Pending | May 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial