Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Cortica Ltd.

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (60%)
1
Easy (20%)
1
Unknown (20%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (60%)
§112 only1 (20%)
No statute on record1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
60% of docket
2
Communications
40% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALLEN, KYLA GUAN-PING TI 1 90.0% +15.4%
ROSARIO, DENNIS 1 69.1% +28.6%
CHEN, ALAN S 1 91.1% +6.3%
KEATON, SHERROD L 1 52.7% +36.7%
JACOBS, EDWARD 1 33.9% +45.4%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17755822 ENSEMBLE OF NARROW AI AGENTS CHEN, ALAN S 30d
18155725 CONCEPT BASED SEGMENTATION ALLEN, KYLA GUAN-PING TI 84d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
15700893 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENRICHING A SEARCHABLE CONCEPT DATABASE JACOBS, EDWARD 2070d overdue
18155707 SEMI-SUPERVISED LEARNING VIA DIFFERENT MODALITIES ROSARIO, DENNIS 110d overdue
17443476 UNSUPERVISED LEARNING KEATON, SHERROD L 86d overdue
18155725 CONCEPT BASED SEGMENTATION ALLEN, KYLA GUAN-PING TI 84d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2661 1
2676 1
2125 1
2148 1
2159 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18155725 CONCEPT BASED SEGMENTATION ALLEN, KYLA GUAN-PING TI 2661 §112 Non-Final OA 84d Pending Jan 17, 2023
18155707 SEMI-SUPERVISED LEARNING VIA DIFFERENT MODALITIES ROSARIO, DENNIS 2676 §103 Final Rejection 110d overdue Pending Jan 17, 2023
17755822 ENSEMBLE OF NARROW AI AGENTS CHEN, ALAN S 2125 §103 Final Rejection 30d Pending May 09, 2022
17443476 UNSUPERVISED LEARNING KEATON, SHERROD L 2148 Other Final Rejection 86d overdue Pending Jul 27, 2021
15700893 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENRICHING A SEARCHABLE CONCEPT DATABASE JACOBS, EDWARD 2159 §103 Non-Final OA 2070d overdue Pending Sep 11, 2017

Managing Cortica Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month