Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Cortical Io AG currently manages a patent portfolio within the Computing & Software technology area. The data shows 1 pending office action across the entire portfolio. This single action represents the current active engagement with the patent office for this entity, indicating a focused prosecution effort for their software technology.
The prosecution is highly concentrated, involving 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's intellectual property is being evaluated within a specific technical niche by a single official. Such a narrow examination footprint means that the immediate patenting success for the portfolio depends on the interpretation of one individual within one administrative unit.
LE, MICHAEL is identified as the busiest examiner for this company, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because this examiner holds the 1 pending office action, the near-term outcomes for the company are directly tied to this individual's review. Practitioners should focus on the specific tendencies of LE, MICHAEL to advance the Computing & Software filings.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LE, MICHAEL | 1 | 66.0% | +21.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18912453 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MAPPING DATA ITEMS TO SPARSE DISTRIBUTED REPRESENTATIONS | LE, MICHAEL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18912453 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MAPPING DATA ITEMS TO SPARSE DISTRIBUTED REPRESENTATIONS | LE, MICHAEL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2163 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18912453 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MAPPING DATA ITEMS TO SPARSE DISTRIBUTED REPRESENTATIONS | LE, MICHAEL | 2163 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialCortical Io AG has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Michael Le has the most, with 1 of Cortical Io AG's pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
