Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Corvictus LLC holds a patent portfolio within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio is currently facing 1 pending office action. This activity is restricted to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a narrow focus for the current prosecution efforts. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the technical scope is limited to a specific examination group.
FLICK, JASON E is the busiest examiner for Corvictus LLC, managing 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action constitutes the total volume of active matters for the portfolio. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution path is singular. The outcome of the current portfolio activity depends entirely on the interaction with FLICK, JASON E and the specific standards of the associated art unit during the examination process.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLICK, JASON E | 1 | 80.6% | +13.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18381535 | EMERGENCY MEDICAL INTERVENTION DEVICE | FLICK, JASON E | 5d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18381535 | EMERGENCY MEDICAL INTERVENTION DEVICE | FLICK, JASON E | 5d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18381535 | EMERGENCY MEDICAL INTERVENTION DEVICE | FLICK, JASON E | 3783 | §101§102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 5d | Pending | Oct 18, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial