Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Corwave SA is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area and currently has 1 pending office action. This pending matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a focused area of prosecution for the company's current filings. The concentration in 1 art unit suggests that the company's current innovations are being evaluated by a specific group of experts in the medical and mechanical fields.
TEJANI, ANKIT D is the busiest examiner for Corwave SA, with 1 pending office action under their review. This examiner manages the full extent of the company's current pending workload, as the busiest examiner pending count is 1. The company's immediate success in the medical devices and mechanical engineering field is tied to the outcomes within this single art unit and examiner assignment. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of this 1 examiner, as they represent the only active point of contact for the company's pending patent applications at this time.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEJANI, ANKIT D | 1 | 81.0% | +16.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18676020 | IMPLANTABLE PUMP SYSTEM HAVING AN UNDULATING MEMBRANE | TEJANI, ANKIT D | 9d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18676020 | IMPLANTABLE PUMP SYSTEM HAVING AN UNDULATING MEMBRANE | TEJANI, ANKIT D | 9d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18676020 | IMPLANTABLE PUMP SYSTEM HAVING AN UNDULATING MEMBRANE | TEJANI, ANKIT D | 3796 | §103Other | Final Rejection | 9d | Pending | May 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial