Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Costar Realty Information Inc. has 3 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. The portfolio is spread across 3 distinct examiners. Because the number of pending office actions matches the number of examiners, each case is currently being reviewed by a unique individual.
SONNERS, SCOTT E is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. This workload of 1 action is one of the 3 pending office actions currently active. Prosecution involves distinct art units for the applications in this technology area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRAWFORD, JACINTA M | 1 | 88.0% | +9.7% |
| SONNERS, SCOTT E | 1 | 69.1% | +12.2% |
| CZEKAJ, DAVID J | 1 | 49.8% | -7.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19440633 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND PRESENTING 3D AND OTHER REPRESENTATIONS AND ASSOCIATED DATA | CRAWFORD, JACINTA M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19440638 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND PRESENTING 3D AND OTHER REPRESENTATIONS AND ASSOCIATED DATA | SONNERS, SCOTT E | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2617 | 1 |
| 2613 | 1 |
| 2488 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19440633 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND PRESENTING 3D AND OTHER REPRESENTATIONS AND ASSOCIATED DATA | CRAWFORD, JACINTA M | 2617 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 05, 2026 |
| 19440638 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND PRESENTING 3D AND OTHER REPRESENTATIONS AND ASSOCIATED DATA | SONNERS, SCOTT E | 2613 | §102 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 05, 2026 |
| 19224340 | CAPTURING AND ALIGNING PANORAMIC IMAGE AND DEPTH DATA | CZEKAJ, DAVID J | 2488 | §103Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 30, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial