Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The Council Of Scientific And Industrial Research (An Indian Registered Body Incorporated Under The) has 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V is the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because the portfolio has only 1 pending office action, TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V is responsible for all current pending matters.
The use of 1 distinct art unit for the 1 pending office action suggests a specific technical focus. Practitioners should note that the 1 distinct examiner manages the totality of the company's current prosecution. The 1 busiest examiner pending action represents the complete workload within the 1 distinct art unit. This centralized structure for the 1 pending office action allows for a focused approach to the examiner's requirements. The examiner is the point of contact for the current pending matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V | 1 | 55.4% | +46.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17773356 | ORGANIC SELENIUM ENRICHED EDIBLE MARINE MICROALGAL BIOMASS | TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17773356 | ORGANIC SELENIUM ENRICHED EDIBLE MARINE MICROALGAL BIOMASS | TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V | 1615 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 29, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial