Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cp6 Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to a distinct examiner. The prosecution is conducted within a sole art unit, reflecting a focused administrative path for the company's current patent efforts. This concentration suggests that the company's immediate legal strategy is tied to a specific technical niche within the broader Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
LIANG, HONGYE is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. As the total number of pending office actions is the amount already stated, this examiner is responsible for the entirety of the company's active workload. This creates a direct relationship between the company and a single examiner. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific examination patterns of LIANG, HONGYE to effectively manage the active matter.
The presence of a sole art unit and a distinct examiner means that the company's immediate success depends on this specific interaction. The 1 pending office action is the only active matter currently being prosecuted. Practitioners can focus their strategy on the specific requirements of the art unit and the individual examiner's standards. However, this lack of diversification means the entire current portfolio is subject to the standards of a single administrative group.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIANG, HONGYE | 1 | 63.8% | +52.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18845037 | VEHICLE ACCIDENT ANALYSIS SYSTEM AND METHOD, AND USER TERMINAL | LIANG, HONGYE | 2d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18845037 | VEHICLE ACCIDENT ANALYSIS SYSTEM AND METHOD, AND USER TERMINAL | LIANG, HONGYE | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3664 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18845037 | VEHICLE ACCIDENT ANALYSIS SYSTEM AND METHOD, AND USER TERMINAL | LIANG, HONGYE | 3664 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Sep 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial