Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Cpi Card Group - Minnesota Inc.

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cpi Card Group - Minnesota Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, WALSH, DANIEL I, who is currently handling the entirety of the company's pending workload at the office. This high level of concentration means that the company's current patent strategy in this sector is tied to a single administrative path.

Because WALSH, DANIEL I is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, the company's current patent activity is highly concentrated. There is no distribution across different administrative divisions or personnel, as the 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit represent the full scope of the active portfolio. This concentration simplifies the tracking of pending responses within this specific technology sector, as there are no other active matters to monitor. By focusing on a single examiner and art unit, the company can develop a highly specialized response strategy for its semiconductor filings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WALSH, DANIEL I 1 64.3% +12.0%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19413477 TAMPER EVIDENT CARD PACKAGE AND METHOD WALSH, DANIEL I —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2876 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19413477 TAMPER EVIDENT CARD PACKAGE AND METHOD WALSH, DANIEL I 2876 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 09, 2025

Managing Cpi Card Group - Minnesota Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month