Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The company patent portfolio for Cranium AI Inc. currently shows 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, GUNDRY, STEPHEN T, who is also identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution strategy is currently focused on a single point of contact within the USPTO.
For a practitioner, this concentration means that the entire pending portfolio's progress relies on the interaction with GUNDRY, STEPHEN T. Since there is only 1 busiest examiner pending action, there are no other active cases to balance the workload or provide alternative examiner perspectives. The presence of the art unit suggests that the Networking & Security filings are not currently spread across different examining divisions.
This scope of activity requires a dedicated focus on the specific requirements and feedback of the assigned examiner. Practitioners should recognize that with only 1 pending office action, the portfolio does not currently exhibit the complexity of larger sets of filings. The relationship with the 1 distinct examiner is the most critical element for the company's immediate patent prosecution goals in this technology area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GUNDRY, STEPHEN T | 1 | 91.8% | +8.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19201126 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SECURITY PLATFORM | GUNDRY, STEPHEN T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2435 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19201126 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SECURITY PLATFORM | GUNDRY, STEPHEN T | 2435 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 07, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialCranium AI Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Stephen T Gundry has the most, with 1 of Cranium AI Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
