Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Createme Technologies Inc. has 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, ensuring that each matter is reviewed by a different individual. Furthermore, the prosecution is divided across 2 distinct art units, which suggests that even with a small number of pending cases, the company is engaging with multiple administrative groups within the patent office. This distribution prevents a concentration of risk or reliance on a single examiner's interpretation of the prior art.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MUSSER, BARBARA J, who is currently overseeing 1 pending office action. With only a small number of pending office actions in total, the workload is perfectly distributed across the distinct examiners and art units involved. For practitioners, this means that the prosecution of these matters will likely proceed independently, as they are subject to the different standards and cultures of separate art units. The lack of overlap between the examiners suggests that insights gained from one action may not directly apply to the other, as the busiest examiner handles only 1 matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUSSER, BARBARA J | 1 | 71.1% | +26.6% |
| VELEZ-LOPEZ, MARIO M | 1 | 74.5% | +5.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19273426 | AUTOMATED GARMENT MANUFACTURING USING ADHESIVE BONDING | MUSSER, BARBARA J | — |
| 18638011 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED GARMENT ASSEMBLY | VELEZ-LOPEZ, MARIO M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19273426 | AUTOMATED GARMENT MANUFACTURING USING ADHESIVE BONDING | MUSSER, BARBARA J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1746 | 1 |
| 2118 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19273426 | AUTOMATED GARMENT MANUFACTURING USING ADHESIVE BONDING | MUSSER, BARBARA J | 1746 | §102§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 18, 2025 |
| 18638011 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED GARMENT ASSEMBLY | VELEZ-LOPEZ, MARIO M | 2118 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialCreateme Technologies Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Barbara J Musser has the most, with 1 of Createme Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
