Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Creator Inc. is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This 1 matter constitutes the whole of the company's active prosecution as shown in the data. The alignment with Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering suggests a portfolio focused on specific technical advancements in this field.
The prosecution is characterized by concentration, with 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved. DEONAUTH, NIRVANA is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. For the practitioner, this means that the success of the current filing depends on the specific interpretations and procedural expectations of this 1 examiner.
Because there is only 1 distinct art unit, the subject matter is being handled within 1 specialized group at the USPTO. This can simplify the prosecution process by ensuring that the examiner is a specialist in the relevant field. With 1 pending office action, the company can dedicate its resources to addressing the specific concerns raised by DEONAUTH, NIRVANA without the need to coordinate across multiple active cases.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEONAUTH, NIRVANA | 1 | 69.8% | +33.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18469769 | RETURNABLE INDUSTRIAL RACK SYSTEM | DEONAUTH, NIRVANA | 3d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18469769 | RETURNABLE INDUSTRIAL RACK SYSTEM | DEONAUTH, NIRVANA | 3d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3726 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18469769 | RETURNABLE INDUSTRIAL RACK SYSTEM | DEONAUTH, NIRVANA | 3726 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 3d overdue | Pending | Sep 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial