Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cresicor Inc. operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 1 pending office action currently on record. This activity is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit, showing a specific technical focus for the pending matter. A single distinct examiner, DURAN, ARTHUR D, is responsible for this pending action, making them the busiest examiner for the portfolio at this time.
The presence of 1 pending office action under 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit indicates a highly singular prosecution front. Practitioners monitoring this portfolio can focus their analysis on the specific practices of DURAN, ARTHUR D within the mechanical systems domain. The lack of multiple pending actions or examiners suggests a streamlined or early-stage prosecution phase for the company's current intellectual property efforts. This concentration in the art unit means the company's current legal strategy is focused on a narrow technical field, requiring precise navigation of the specific examiner's requirements.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DURAN, ARTHUR D | 1 | 15.8% | +23.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18886112 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS OF DEDUCTION BACKUP DATA | DURAN, ARTHUR D | 29d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18886112 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS OF DEDUCTION BACKUP DATA | DURAN, ARTHUR D | 29d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3622 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18886112 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS OF DEDUCTION BACKUP DATA | DURAN, ARTHUR D | 3622 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 29d overdue | Pending | Sep 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial