Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cricut Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cricut Inc. has 6 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 6 actions are distributed among 6 distinct examiners, with each examiner responsible for one case. The portfolio is spread across 5 distinct art units, meaning that while every examiner is unique, two of them are working within the same technical department. This distribution indicates that the company's medical device innovations are being evaluated independently by six different reviewers in five specialized departments.

BANH, DAVID H is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. Because there are 6 pending actions in total, the workload is perfectly distributed across the 6 distinct examiners. This ratio of actions to examiners across 5 art units suggests that the company's research is spread across several technical areas. Practitioners must manage six unique examiner relationships and adapt to the specific standards of five different technical groups to resolve the current pending matters effectively.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BANH, DAVID H 1 71.8% +12.6%
POUNCIL, DARNELL A 1 21.4% +30.5%
WU, YANNA 1 81.0% +34.1%
FLORES JR, DONALD M 1 77.0% +26.9%
CROSBY JR, RICHARD D 1 69.3% +15.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18960880 System and Method for Providing Digital Content WU, YANNA —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18977421 Method for Providing Digital Content POUNCIL, DARNELL A —
18848236 Crafting Pad FLORES JR, DONALD M —
17757086 Matless Cutting Machine and Methods CROSBY JR, RICHARD D —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19248883 Heat Press BANH, DAVID H —
18977421 Method for Providing Digital Content POUNCIL, DARNELL A —
18960880 System and Method for Providing Digital Content WU, YANNA —
18848236 Crafting Pad FLORES JR, DONALD M —
17757086 Matless Cutting Machine and Methods CROSBY JR, RICHARD D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3725 1
3622 1
2615 1
1781 1
3724 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19248883 Heat Press BANH, DAVID H 3725 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 25, 2025
18977421 Method for Providing Digital Content POUNCIL, DARNELL A 3622 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18960880 System and Method for Providing Digital Content WU, YANNA 2615 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18848236 Crafting Pad FLORES JR, DONALD M 1781 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 18, 2024
17757086 Matless Cutting Machine and Methods CROSBY JR, RICHARD D 3724 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 09, 2022

Managing Cricut Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Cricut Inc. have?

Cricut Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Cricut Inc. applications?

David H Banh has the most, with 1 of Cricut Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Cricut Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month