Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Cricut Inc.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 3 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cricut Inc. currently has 6 pending office actions within its company patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 6 distinct examiners, resulting in a one-to-one ratio where each examiner handles a single matter. The prosecution is focused within 3 distinct art units, suggesting that the pending applications are grouped into a few specific technical categories.

BANH, DAVID H is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This single action represents a portion of the total 6 pending office actions for the company. Because the workload is evenly distributed among the 6 distinct examiners, the portfolio's progress is not overly dependent on any one individual's examination style.

For practitioners, the concentration within 3 distinct art units provides some opportunity for consistent technical arguments across the 6 pending office actions. However, the involvement of 6 distinct examiners still requires a case-by-case approach to address different individual preferences. The overall success of the portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area will be determined by the collective outcomes of these 6 independent prosecution efforts across the 3 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (17%)
§103 only3 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
2
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BANH, DAVID H 1 71.7% +12.5%
POUNCIL, DARNELL A 1 21.4% +30.7%
WU, YANNA 1 80.9% +34.4%
FLORES JR, DONALD M 1 76.9% +27.3%
WATSON, HALEIGH NOELLE 1 34.5% +79.2%
CROSBY JR, RICHARD D 1 69.0% +15.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18960880 System and Method for Providing Digital Content WU, YANNA —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18977421 Method for Providing Digital Content POUNCIL, DARNELL A —
18848236 Crafting Pad FLORES JR, DONALD M —
17757086 Matless Cutting Machine and Methods CROSBY JR, RICHARD D —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19248883 Heat Press BANH, DAVID H —
18977421 Method for Providing Digital Content POUNCIL, DARNELL A —
18960880 System and Method for Providing Digital Content WU, YANNA —
18848236 Crafting Pad FLORES JR, DONALD M —
18260169 Crafting Apparatus Support Member WATSON, HALEIGH NOELLE —
17757086 Matless Cutting Machine and Methods CROSBY JR, RICHARD D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3724 2
3725 1
3622 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19248883 Heat Press BANH, DAVID H 3725 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 25, 2025
18977421 Method for Providing Digital Content POUNCIL, DARNELL A 3622 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18960880 System and Method for Providing Digital Content WU, YANNA — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18848236 Crafting Pad FLORES JR, DONALD M — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 18, 2024
18260169 Crafting Apparatus Support Member WATSON, HALEIGH NOELLE 3724 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 30, 2023
17757086 Matless Cutting Machine and Methods CROSBY JR, RICHARD D 3724 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 09, 2022

Managing Cricut Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month