Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ctak LLC

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Ctak LLC currently manages 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This single matter is assigned to THOMAS, BRANDI N, who is the distinct examiner involved in the company's prosecution. As the examiner, THOMAS, BRANDI N is also the busiest for this portfolio, with 1 pending action under review.

The prosecution activity is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very narrow technical focus for the company's current patent efforts. With the 1 pending office action, the portfolio represents a highly specific point of contact with the USPTO.

Practitioners should note that the entire prosecution experience for this company is currently defined by an examiner's perspective within a specialized unit. This lack of examiner or art unit variety means that the outcome of the company's current patent strategy depends entirely on the evaluation of this individual. The pending office action is subject to the specific standards of this technical group.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
THOMAS, BRANDI N 1 82.7% +7.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19433363 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR THE AMELIORATION OF ECTATIC AND IRREGULAR CORNEAL DISORDERS THOMAS, BRANDI N —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2872 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19433363 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR THE AMELIORATION OF ECTATIC AND IRREGULAR CORNEAL DISORDERS THOMAS, BRANDI N 2872 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 26, 2025

Managing Ctak LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Ctak LLC have?

Ctak LLC has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Ctak LLC applications?

Brandi N Thomas has the most, with 1 of Ctak LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Ctak LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month