Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ctxt Pty Ltd.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ctxt Pty Ltd. currently has a specific prosecution footprint within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio contains 1 pending office action, which represents the total active workload for the company. This matter is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, showing that the company's current patent office interactions are limited to a specific point of review. This suggests a targeted strategy for its current biotechnology innovations.

The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a focused technical application of its research. FETTEROLF, BRANDON J is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. As this is the only 1 pending office action in the portfolio, the examiner's decisions will have an impact on the company's current prosecution success. Practitioners should note that with only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution timeline and results are dependent on the specific procedures of this office location.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting only1 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHOWALTER, ALEXANDER KEITH 1 54.4% +26.3%
FETTEROLF, BRANDON J 1 52.0% +17.4%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18903849 Nitrogen-Linked Benzisoxazole Sulfonamide Derivatives SHOWALTER, ALEXANDER KEITH —
18016070 KAT6 INHIBITOR METHODS AND COMBINATIONS FOR CANCER TREATMENT FETTEROLF, BRANDON J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1629 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18903849 Nitrogen-Linked Benzisoxazole Sulfonamide Derivatives SHOWALTER, ALEXANDER KEITH — §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 01, 2024
18016070 KAT6 INHIBITOR METHODS AND COMBINATIONS FOR CANCER TREATMENT FETTEROLF, BRANDON J 1629 DP Final Rejection — Pending

Managing Ctxt Pty Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month