Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cube Packaging Solutions Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner working within a distinct art unit. The concentration of the portfolio suggests a focused prosecution effort at this stage, as all current activity is localized to a point of contact within the patent office. This narrow distribution simplifies the monitoring of deadlines and examiner-specific trends for the company. Practitioners can leverage this focus to develop a deep understanding of the specific examiner's requirements.
KIM, YUNJU is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling a pending office action. This individual accounts for the entirety of the company's pending workload. Practitioners can focus their strategy on the specific practices of this examiner and art unit to resolve the outstanding action. Because there is a distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate prosecution success depends on the outcome of this specific interaction. The alignment of the busiest examiner's workload with the total pending office actions indicates no other examiners are currently active. This allows for a dedicated response strategy within the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM, YUNJU | 1 | 55.2% | +35.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18912228 | INSERT CHANGEOVER SYSTEM FOR AN INJECTION MOLD | KIM, YUNJU | 20d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18912228 | INSERT CHANGEOVER SYSTEM FOR AN INJECTION MOLD | KIM, YUNJU | 20d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1742 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18912228 | INSERT CHANGEOVER SYSTEM FOR AN INJECTION MOLD | KIM, YUNJU | 1742 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Oct 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial