Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Cubic Corporation currently has 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. The portfolio's current pending workload is entirely contained within this single matter, showing a streamlined prosecution path for the company's current Communications intellectual property.
Kharye Pope is the busiest examiner for the company, handling 1 pending office action. This 1 action constitutes the full set of pending office actions for Cubic Corporation. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit indicates that the company's current efforts are focused on a single point of contact. This lack of complexity in the current data suggests a very specific technical focus.
With only 1 pending office action, the company's immediate progress is tied to this specific examiner's review. Kharye Pope is the sole examiner responsible for the 1 distinct art unit involved. Practitioners can concentrate their strategy on this single relationship. The 1 pending office action in the Communications area represents the entirety of the company's active engagement with the office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| POPE, KHARYE | 1 | 65.8% | +21.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18433238 | CHIRP SIGNAL FILTERING FOR DIGITAL GATEWAY | POPE, KHARYE | 15d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2693 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18433238 | CHIRP SIGNAL FILTERING FOR DIGITAL GATEWAY | POPE, KHARYE | 2693 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Feb 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial