Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Cureapp Inc. operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently faces 1 pending office action. This action is being handled by a single distinct examiner. The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit.
HIEP VAN NGUYEN is designated as the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is currently managing a single pending office action. Because there is only a single pending office action in total, this examiner handles the entire pending workload for the company. The alignment of a single distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit for the pending office action indicates a highly centralized prosecution environment at this stage.
Practitioners should note that the single pending matter defines the current interaction with the patent office. The focus on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems suggests the specific technical nature of the pending office action. Success in this instance depends entirely on the interaction with HIEP VAN NGUYEN.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, HIEP VAN | 1 | 55.3% | +28.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18817860 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM | NGUYEN, HIEP VAN | 149d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18817860 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM | NGUYEN, HIEP VAN | 149d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3686 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18817860 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM | NGUYEN, HIEP VAN | 3686 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | 149d overdue | Pending | Aug 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial