Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Curly Cube GmbH has 2 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These are handled by 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution shows that each of the 2 pending office actions is being handled by a different individual in a different art unit, which can lead to varied prosecution experiences. For practitioners, the involvement of 2 distinct art units means that the company's technology is being evaluated under two different sets of technical standards.
NGUYEN, KEVIN M is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action. While NGUYEN, KEVIN M is the busiest, they only handle 1 of the 2 pending office actions. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the Communications innovations are technically diverse. Practitioners should treat each of the 2 pending office actions as a completely independent legal effort, as the 2 distinct art units will likely apply different examination standards. The outcome for each case will depend on the specific interaction with each of the 2 distinct examiners, including NGUYEN, KEVIN M.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, KEVIN M | 1 | 79.1% | +4.4% |
| NADKARNI, SARVESH J | 1 | 72.7% | +13.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19269292 | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A COMPUTER BY MEANS OF AN EYE TRACKING CAMERA, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM AND SYSTEM | NGUYEN, KEVIN M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19233481 | METHOD FOR GENERATING AN OPTIMIZED ON-SCREEN KEYBOARD FOR A DEVICE, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM AND DEVICE FOR A SUPPORTED COMMUNICATION | NADKARNI, SARVESH J | 7d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2628 | 1 |
| 2629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19269292 | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A COMPUTER BY MEANS OF AN EYE TRACKING CAMERA, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM AND SYSTEM | NGUYEN, KEVIN M | 2628 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 15, 2025 |
| 19233481 | METHOD FOR GENERATING AN OPTIMIZED ON-SCREEN KEYBOARD FOR A DEVICE, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM AND DEVICE FOR A SUPPORTED COMMUNICATION | NADKARNI, SARVESH J | 2629 | §103 | Final Rejection | 7d | Pending | Jun 10, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialCurly Cube GmbH has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Kevin M Nguyen has the most, with 1 of Curly Cube GmbH's pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
