Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Current Surgical Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Current Surgical Inc. manages a patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Currently, the portfolio has 1 pending office action. This action represents the current level of active engagement with the patent office for the company's medical device filings. For a practitioner, this indicates a focused prosecution stage where a single application is the primary administrative priority.

The filings are being reviewed by a distinct examiner across a single art unit. This suggests that the company's innovations are being evaluated through a single administrative channel at the USPTO. ASGHAR, AMINAH is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The use of a single art unit ensures that the company's medical device technologies are evaluated against a consistent set of prior art and examination standards.

ASGHAR, AMINAH is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is only a single pending action overall, the review by ASGHAR, AMINAH is the sole focus of the company's current patenting activity. Practitioners should tailor their strategy to the specific requirements of ASGHAR, AMINAH and the art unit involved to advance the pending matter.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ASGHAR, AMINAH 1 61.2% +46.7%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18099240 ULTRASOUND ABLATION APPARATUS AND METHODS OF USE ASGHAR, AMINAH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3797 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18099240 ULTRASOUND ABLATION APPARATUS AND METHODS OF USE ASGHAR, AMINAH 3797 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 19, 2023

Managing Current Surgical Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month