Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Cyber Surgery S L currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's prosecution activity is concentrated, featuring 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This narrow focus suggests that the company is currently pursuing a specific patent objective rather than a large, diverse portfolio of applications.
The busiest examiner for this entity is PRATHER, GREGORY T, who is managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This 1 busiest examiner pending action constitutes the whole of the company's 1 pending office action. Because the company is only interacting with 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution process is highly specialized. Practitioners must navigate the specific preferences of Gregory T Prather, as there are no other active examiners currently providing feedback on the company's filings in this technology area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRATHER, GREGORY T | 1 | 68.5% | +21.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18323406 | PARKING ROBOT SYSTEM | PRATHER, GREGORY T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3618 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18323406 | PARKING ROBOT SYSTEM | PRATHER, GREGORY T | 3618 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 25, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial