Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days
Cybex GmbH has 7 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are spread across 6 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units. CZYZ, STEVEN J is the busiest examiner, handling 2 of the pending actions. The remaining 5 actions are each assigned to a different examiner.
The presence of 5 distinct art units for 7 pending actions suggests that the company's mechanical and transportation filings are technically diverse. Practitioners should note that CZYZ, STEVEN J is the only examiner managing more than one action, making his examination style particularly relevant. The broad distribution across 5 art units means that the company must adapt to various examination norms within the USPTO's mechanical systems divisions. With 7 pending office actions, the portfolio requires a multi-faceted approach to address the 6 distinct examiners involved.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (14%) |
| §112 only | 3 (43%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (43%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CZYZ, STEVEN J | 2 | 93.6% | +2.3% |
| LIBBY, TROY ALAN | 1 | 92.3% | +9.1% |
| ALEKSIC, NEVENA | 1 | 75.6% | +9.6% |
| BONZELL, PHILIP J | 1 | 78.6% | +12.3% |
| ENGLISH, PETER C | 1 | 33.5% | +26.9% |
| DUNN, DAVID R | 1 | 28.6% | +30.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35523356 | Carrying device for babies | CZYZ, STEVEN J | — |
| 35522965 | Carrying device for babies | CZYZ, STEVEN J | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18835244 | SEATING FURNITURE, ESPECIALLY A HIGH CHAIR FOR A BABY OR TODDLER | LIBBY, TROY ALAN | 26d |
| 18546399 | TENSION-TRANSMITTING DEVICE FOR A CHILD TRAILER | ENGLISH, PETER C | 50d |
| 18714007 | CHILD SEAT BASE FOR RECEIVING A SEAT ELEMENT | BONZELL, PHILIP J | 56d |
| 18250951 | CHILD SEAT WITH IMPACT SHIELD FOR MOUNTING ON A MOTOR VEHICLE SEAT | DUNN, DAVID R | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18546399 | TENSION-TRANSMITTING DEVICE FOR A CHILD TRAILER | ENGLISH, PETER C | 50d |
| 18714007 | CHILD SEAT BASE FOR RECEIVING A SEAT ELEMENT | BONZELL, PHILIP J | 56d |
| 18250951 | CHILD SEAT WITH IMPACT SHIELD FOR MOUNTING ON A MOTOR VEHICLE SEAT | DUNN, DAVID R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3636 | 2 |
| 2913 | 2 |
| 3647 | 1 |
| 3642 | 1 |
| 3993 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18835244 | SEATING FURNITURE, ESPECIALLY A HIGH CHAIR FOR A BABY OR TODDLER | LIBBY, TROY ALAN | 3636 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 26d | Pending | Aug 01, 2024 |
| 18728759 | CHILD-ACCOMMODATION DEVICE, IN PARTICULAR PRAM AND/OR CHILD SEAT, WITH A BELT SYSTEM | ALEKSIC, NEVENA | 3647 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 12, 2024 |
| 35523356 | Carrying device for babies | CZYZ, STEVEN J | 2913 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 19, 2024 |
| 18714007 | CHILD SEAT BASE FOR RECEIVING A SEAT ELEMENT | BONZELL, PHILIP J | 3642 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 56d | Pending | May 28, 2024 |
| 35522965 | Carrying device for babies | CZYZ, STEVEN J | 2913 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 10, 2024 |
| 18546399 | TENSION-TRANSMITTING DEVICE FOR A CHILD TRAILER | ENGLISH, PETER C | 3993 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 50d | Pending | Aug 14, 2023 |
| 18250951 | CHILD SEAT WITH IMPACT SHIELD FOR MOUNTING ON A MOTOR VEHICLE SEAT | DUNN, DAVID R | 3636 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialCybex GmbH has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 6 examiners.
Steven J Czyz has the most, with 2 of Cybex GmbH's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
