Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (83%) |
| §112 only | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KHAN, IFTEKHAR A | 2 | 77.8% | +25.8% |
| SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. | 1 | 30.4% | +29.4% |
| MIRABITO, MICHAEL PAUL | 1 | 34.3% | +0.0% |
| NGUYEN, HIEP VAN | 1 | 55.1% | +29.3% |
| HOLCOMB, MARK | 1 | 34.2% | +40.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17163430 | TRIAL DESIGN WITH PARETO TECHNIQUES | NGUYEN, HIEP VAN | 91d overdue |
| 17163424 | MULTI-SPACE TRIAL DESIGN PLATFORM | HOLCOMB, MARK | 77d overdue |
| 17847025 | FILTERING DESIGNS USING BOUNDARIES DERIVED FROM OPTIMAL DESIGNS | KHAN, IFTEKHAR A | 56d overdue |
| 17847040 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRADE-OFF VISUAL ANALYSIS | KHAN, IFTEKHAR A | 19d overdue |
| 17847057 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLINICIAN INTERFACE | SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2187 | 3 |
| 3684 | 1 |
| 3686 | 1 |
| 3685 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17847057 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLINICIAN INTERFACE | SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. | 3684 | §103 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Jun 22, 2022 |
| 17847040 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRADE-OFF VISUAL ANALYSIS | KHAN, IFTEKHAR A | 2187 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 19d overdue | Pending | Jun 22, 2022 |
| 17847025 | FILTERING DESIGNS USING BOUNDARIES DERIVED FROM OPTIMAL DESIGNS | KHAN, IFTEKHAR A | 2187 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 56d overdue | Pending | Jun 22, 2022 |
| 17354639 | METHODS AND SYSTEM FOR REDUCING COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY OF CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN SIMULATIONS | MIRABITO, MICHAEL PAUL | 2187 | §103 | Final Rejection | 88d overdue | Pending | Jun 22, 2021 |
| 17163430 | TRIAL DESIGN WITH PARETO TECHNIQUES | NGUYEN, HIEP VAN | 3686 | §112 | Final Rejection | 91d overdue | Pending | Jan 30, 2021 |
| 17163424 | MULTI-SPACE TRIAL DESIGN PLATFORM | HOLCOMB, MARK | 3685 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 77d overdue | Pending | Jan 30, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial