Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Daechang Seat Co. Ltd-Dongtan

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Daechang Seat Co. Ltd. - Dongtan has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This activity is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. This distribution indicates a very specific focus for the company's current patenting efforts in the mechanical systems field. Such a concentrated prosecution profile allows for a targeted legal strategy, as the company is dealing with a limited number of variables within the patent office's examination structure.

ACOSTA, ERIC LAZARUS is the busiest examiner, with the pending office action. This examiner is currently the primary point of contact for the portfolio's pending mechanical systems applications. Practitioners should focus on the examiner's specific approach to transportation and mechanical claims to ensure that the prosecution remains efficient. The outcome of the company's current efforts in this technology area will be largely determined by the resolution of the issues raised by this examiner in the pending matter.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GABLER, PHILIP F 1 72.9% +23.4%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18922081 PNEUMATIC VEHICLE SEAT GABLER, PHILIP F —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3636 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18922081 PNEUMATIC VEHICLE SEAT GABLER, PHILIP F 3636 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 21, 2024

Managing Daechang Seat Co. Ltd-Dongtan's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month